Feminism and the Disposable Male

Posted by Thraxxus on Dec 29th, 2011 and filed under Biology. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry from your site

I made a discovery last night, purely due to a friend sending me a link to a youtube video, that really took me for a ride into the surreal. While watching this video I found myself to be totally enthralled by not only the subject matter being discussed but also by the person delivering the message: Men are not Disposable. (Understand this – rarely do I want to meet anyone, and I want to meet her). This may seem like a rather odd subject to begin with to some as one might instantly conclude that men are not expendable as one could argue nobody is. The catch is that “GirlWritesWhat” (her blog is owningyourshit.blogspot.com) , the author of this piece, argues that society actually believes and acts contrary to that belief. Her delivery btw is not only articulate but borderline breathtaking in the way in which she makes a point and backs that point up with historical references. I know right? I believe her to be educated, probably more than me.

So why is this topic even worth discussion? One could quickly ascertain that the subject may very well be counter to what many Feminists believe – men are shit and get everything. The odd point of contention over the years has been the idea of equality – what “GirlWritesWhat” is stating, really, and what I have stated in the past, is that equality is a great thing if there is real equality. The catch is, and her video argues this point,  that this is not the actual case at all. In fact, according to her, men are, in a fashion, given the short end of the stick when it comes to equality – a point that would make most Feminists lose their god damned minds. I can hear the shrill sounds of chanting “BURN THE WITCH!” now.

How is it that there is not true equality? Moreover, what is the problem with the concept? Feminists seem to argue that they want equality, but the general observation is that they want equality only when it suits them. Which is really a point being argued in this video, in not so many words.

  1. During wartime, only men are drafted. Not equal.
  2. If a ship sinks, Women and children are saved first. Not Equal.
  3. A boy is expected to be tough, and thus is often time not nurtured, while a girl is protected. Not equal
  4. At birth a boy’s genitalia are hacked at. Not equal.
  5. Women can don men’s clothing and be called cute for it. Men donning women’s clothing are cross dressers. Not Equal.

The list goes on really. I believe that all things should be treated equal, if they are in fact equal. The catch here is that men and women aren’t actually equal. Men excel at some things over women as it is their nature to do so. Like killing stuff. Men are great at killing as men are wired to be hunter gatherers. Women excel at a veritable cornucopia of things over men, almost too many to list really. A major one being multitasking. Women are glorious at it. Why the difference between the two genders? Because they are meant to work together, their skills  are to be employed in a situation by situation basis. Meaning that dependent upon the situation at hand, equality may take a back seat to necessity driving the car.

For instance: A creature with claws and teeth has entered the home. Do you dispatch the 6 foot 2 inch tall 235 lb male to deal with said creature, or the 5 foot 2 inches tall 125 pound female?

For instance: There are 27 different things that are important tomorrow. Do you count on the man, who can think about basically one thing at a time, or the woman who can’t think about only one thing at a time?

These are both ridiculous scenarios, obviously, but they are meant to make a point: Men and women are not equal, but only because of the situation they are found in. Should a female miner be paid as much as a male miner? YES! If she can do the same work. This applies to all fields. If a woman can play Linebacker as good as a man in the NFL then YES she should be given a shot and be paid as such. Period. If there is a war, and the country needs to be defended, then YES both genders need to be called to action. Will they do they exact same job is the question?

That depends on the job. Watch the video. It may be the best 16 minutes you spend this year.

4 Responses for “Feminism and the Disposable Male”

  1. neuroguy says:

    She will be my write-in candidate for the upcoming Presidential Election. Simply awe-inspiring.

  2. Tony says:

    I watched this last night. It’s well worth the watch.

  3. sype says:

    I am not that educated in psychology, or any study of the human emotion, or how the brain works. Just by pure observation; I think that this will never be able to be accomplished. There will never be a “true” equal in the balance of human activities, emotion, or day to day jobs. Unless we have on our hands an equilibrium situation. Men and Women will and can coexist; but I dont think we will ever have on our hands a true equal level playing field.

    Does anyone know if any animal family’s/kingdoms behave this way as well? I know in a herd of elephants; in a dangerous situation the male and females protect the young by making a circle, and the young being in the middle.

    The video does make compelling arguments to which I have never really sat down to think about. I being a 23 year old male just instinctively, thought that Men do the dieing so the women and children can do the living. We break our backs to provide for the women and children. This also got me thinking about what true “honor” means to a man, and a women for that fact.

    By far one of the most interesting videos I have viewed on the tube for a while.

  4. neuroguy says:

    @ sype – nice response and observations.

    to your question… does anyone know if any animal family’s/kingdoms behave this way as well?

    regarding homo sapien sapiens’ anthropological studies and socio-psychology assays, they’ve constructed claudistics (or definable categories) of gender-identified social groupings. currently there are no “shared” or “equitable” gender-based arrangements. it is male or female classified and then the reproduction-based relations get more interesting with husband-brother-wife triades, husband-wife-slave (still very common today) and wife-husband-husband-husband configurations along with the normative polygamist mormon paradigm + many, many more.

    in the animal kingdom – the penguin is the closest to gender equality-based (referencing ingrained duties or normative behaviors) societies. elephants are more akin to lions (elephant group = an alpha bull and cows + offspring – however they also have matriarchal rulesets for cows and caring of the young).

    i, as you, feel the theory of full equality is fruitless and furthermore ignores the gender specializations we’ve evolved to maintain. obviously we are different for a very profound purpose.

    http://io9.com/5062446/female+dominated-societies-are-violent-say-anthropologists

Leave a Reply